Discussion about this post

User's avatar
John's avatar

"Safer than a human" is the whole point.

I'm bullish on Waymo. I've had enough mediocre rideshare rides and see enough fuckery on the road that I'm in favor of more Waymos replacing fallible human drivers.

However, it faces a reporting problem: if an Uber driver does a mistake, it's that one driver's fault. If a Waymo gets in an accident, it's *the whole Waymo system's fault*. This isn't necessarily incorrect, but wide-scale statistical improvements don't tickle our feel-good centers, and we jump on every fault of a new system even if that system measurably improves the average outcome.

So I don't agree with Jason's framing here.

(there are more interesting things to be wary of from Waymo, such as potential market monopoly)

Dogfriend's avatar

You can teach a car the rules of the road but you cannot teach a car the unpredictable way humans drive (and walk).

5 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?