When the case law you are citing isn't real, neither is your case.
Until the DoJ lawyers face personal fines or time in a cell they'll keep doing it.
There really seems to be no accountability beyond "the judge was mad" for these jokers.
# ... their court filing relied on nonexistent legal precedent,
.
IOW, it was *made up*.
This fits right in with the rest of the spewage coming from The Criminal and his lackeys.
It would be nice if the bar association stepped up and disciplined these wankers. I mean, people already think lawyers are scummy, why prove it beyond a reasonable doubt?
"When the case law you are citing isn’t real, neither is your case."
Well said @Jason Weisberger
Until the DoJ lawyers face personal fines or time in a cell they'll keep doing it.
There really seems to be no accountability beyond "the judge was mad" for these jokers.
# ... their court filing relied on nonexistent legal precedent,
.
IOW, it was *made up*.
This fits right in with the rest of the spewage coming from The Criminal and his lackeys.
It would be nice if the bar association stepped up and disciplined these wankers. I mean, people already think lawyers are scummy, why prove it beyond a reasonable doubt?
"When the case law you are citing isn’t real, neither is your case."
Well said @Jason Weisberger